Dumki in collapse on road of LGED 8 months of construction !

News Source

Daily Present Times

Patuakhali Correspondent

News Editor

Eati Akter

Sub editor

Patuakhali Dumki in LGED has not completed 8 months of construction. The road collapsed. Multiple places of 1km road have been given, carpeting has been created There are many small and big holes. 12 feet wide road adjacent to RCC sluice of Pueblo 39 About 9 feet has broken and created a huge hole. Traffic is about to be disrupted. Easybikes, riska-vans of the internal roads are moving with risk. of the entire road at any time Locals are afraid of disconnection. Using low quality construction materials Bricks, sand and soil are freely transported by heavy vehicles including Mahendra loaded with goods on the constructed road Locals think that this has happened. According to local sources, the board office of the upazila is on the west bank of Lemukhali Baga RHD road From Gabtali Bazar via Chalampur Senior Madrasah (ID No. 578964041) the road runs .

The local government engineering department completed the carpeting work in February of the year. road work In the beginning, the concerned contracting company was against M/s Talukdar Enterprise of Patuakhali Locals complained of using low-quality construction materials. But the surface of LGED By substandard construction materials with the connivance of the Supervising Officer (SO). Complete the tender work quickly and leave. At that time, the same SO#39 in the neighboring Muradia Union The construction of another similar road in Tatdhasad; recently built for the transport of goods. Due to the use of carpeting the roads have become in such a state of disrepair. Dumki upazila engineering department has repeatedly complained about this but no benefit has come.

Upazila Although the engineer assured the locals to repair the road with the security deposit of the concerned contractor Stalled by the mysterious role of the Supervising Officer (SO). Nothing more Beneficiary residents of the affected roads have suffered. Md. Jewel Taluder is the owner of M/s Talukder Enterprises regarding the complaint He said that the work had to be done according to the tender quotation. However, construction used in construction The content was of poor quality and not at all accurate. Office considering the increased cost of goods I did the work by bringing the officials’ suggestions and choice of goods. But new carpeting is heavy on the road Mahendra and trucks to transport goods, why should I pay for the destruction of the road? He also said, The sluice was once naturally breached as the water flowed through the tunnel under the adjacent road. It is a matter for the department, there is no legal basis to hold the contractor responsible. Md. Sarafat Ullah, SO in charge of the tender, said that UP is concerned with repairing the damaged roads I am trying to do it with a different project through the chairman. Contractor’s security forfeited Avoiding the question, the contractor cannot be held responsible for natural damage. Rather do it differently will be good Upazila Engineer Md. Azizul Haque said, one year contractor’s bond against each work There is a provision to keep. If the quality of the work is bad in this, repairs are made with the security deposit. mentioned Since the road has not crossed the road, it is not possible to withdraw the security deposit. Apart from that, the recommendation of SO#39; Not supposed to. If this happens, legal action will be taken.

Visits: 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News Source

Daily Present Times

Patuakhali Correspondent

Catagory News